Previously Donald Trump’s campaign adviser Carter Page’s unconventional attempt to put himself into a great combination telecommunications has obtained with a huge thump in court
The judge supervising the Justice Department’s litigation to block the $85 billion AT&T-Time Warner deal refused a request from Page, who isn’t a lawyer, to file a friend-of-the-court summary to put forward in the case.
The Judge Richard Leon signatured and agreed on the decision on Wednesday, after the Department of Justice took the uncommon step of combatant the filing.
“As for general purpose of matter, the Antitrust Division does not encounter amicus briefs in the regional courts,” Department of Justice Lawyer Craig Conrath informed the court. “We note, however, that Dr. Page’s agreement does not appear to be meaningfully applicable to the problems in this case.”
Page assert in the offer brief that reinforcement between telecommunications and media companies “Uplift extreme levels of journalistic thoughtless and dishonesty because it assigns considerable amenities to the media marketplace under their control.”
He told the court that a discrete libelant he brought against Verizon’s promise, which owns Yahoo News and HuffPost, gave him an important and appropriate prospect on the AT&T-Time Warner connection.
Page said he’s “not upset at all” by the court’s decision, adding “it took several years to grow the current harmful situation in which a few firms dominate market structures. So sorting out relevant amendments in respect to that damage will definitely take some time.”